As you may know, last week, California's Department of Public Health ("CDPH") issued a misguided FAQ stating that hemp derived CBD and extracts are prohibited food additives in the state, echoing the FDA's position. Vote Hemp believes the FAQ is fundamentally flawed and in conflict with state law.
For over a decade, Vote Hemp has worked in California to pass hemp legislation. These efforts continue this year through Vote Hemp's sponsorship of SB 1409 that will improve the existing state hemp statute. SB 1409 accomplishes several objectives, including:
- authorizing the California Department of Food and Agriculture to run a pilot program under Sec. 7606 of the Farm Bill to ensure the registration program is compliant with federal law; and
- removing a number unnecessary law enforcement-minded provisions to help streamline production, and other technical amendments needed to align existing state law with language that was passed by voters in Proposition 64
SB 1409 passed out of the Senate and both policy committees in the Assembly unanimously and is picking up co-sponsors each step of the way. The bill will go to the Assembly Appropriations Committee in August and onto the Assembly floor before hitting the Governor’s desk in September.
Vote Hemp continues to look for opportunities to further advance the industry and legislation in the area of hemp processing and registration will most likely be brought forward in a subsequent session. In anticipation of this, Vote Hemp and other stakeholders are working in earnest now to engage CDPH on its flawed policy and enlist your support in doing so. Vote Hemp is requesting urgent meetings with CDPH and the Governor’s office to educate them on why the FAQ is fundamentally flawed and in conflict with the state’s definition of industrial hemp. Vote Hemp is weighing all options for further action should these efforts fail to achieve the complete retraction of this FAQ.
If you would like to add your voice to this effort please email the Department comments, in your own words, incorporating these key points:
- Proposition 64 authorized the cultivation of industrial hemp, independent from cannabis, and in doing so approved the use of any part of the plant. - California Health and Safety Code § 11018.5.
- CBD in and of itself is not scheduled under the federal Controlled Substances Act. Rather, it is a controlled substance when it is sourced from marijuana, but not from industrial hemp.
- The arbitrary prohibition of industrial hemp derived CBD in food products will have a chilling effect on the hemp cultivation industry at the very moment the industry is beginning its launch in California.
- Industrial Hemp is treated as an agricultural product in California and, as such, is regulated by the California Department of Food and Agriculture.
- It should be noted that CDPH’s policy in this area is in conflict with many other states that have authorized the cultivation of industrial hemp and its use as a food, food additive and food supplement.
No comments:
Post a Comment