Friday, November 22, 2019

Ventura County to investigate hold on hemp permits, remedial actions for smell in light of protests

By Kathleen Wilson
Source: vcstar.com

Angry Moorpark residents asked for controls on hemp cultivation at a special meeting of the Ventura County Board of Supervisors on Nov. 19.
Angry Moorpark residents asked for controls on hemp cultivation at a special meeting of the Ventura County Board of Supervisors on Nov. 19. (Photo: KATHLEEN WILSON/THE STAR)


Ventura County supervisors moved this week toward passing land-use protections to address the skunk-like smell from hemp fields after hearing complaints from a stream of angry homeowners in Moorpark.
"We cannot live with it," said Rose Ayoub, one of roughly 200 people who crowded into the Moorpark Community Center Tuesday evening, some spilling into the lobby and outside the doors. 
No action was proposed or could be taken under the state's open meetings law other than to receive a report on hemp production from Agricultural Commissioner Ed Williams. But supervisors could and did give direction to staff on next steps. 
They directed legal counsel to investigate whether Williams' office could stop issuing permits for hemp production temporarily without running afoul of state and federal laws.
Supervisors also asked staff to return with recommendations on how the conflicts between neighborhoods and hemp production can be lessened, including setting up buffers of land where the crop cannot be planted. Supervisors were interested in developing protections for schools, nursing homes and day-care centers as well as residential areas.
"I think we should jump on it," said Supervisor Bob Huber, who represents Simi Valley and Moorpark. 
The report on the issuance of permits is expected to come back to the board in December and the report on mitigations by the next planting season in April. 
It appears that the board has considerable discretion. Supervisors can regulate hemp cultivation up to and including banning it, Chief Assistant County Counsel Michael Walker told the crowd.
About 50 people spoke to the Board of Supervisors, most complaining about the skunk-like odor and health issues, including headaches and allergic reactions they tied to hemp. 
Some residents also expressed fears that their property values would fall and objected that they did not receive advance warning that the newly legalized crop would be planted next to their homes. 
"We are not guinea pigs," Ayoub said. "It is a nuisance."
A minority of the speakers were hemp farmers who defended cultivation of the crop as a way to keep agriculture viable in the high-cost county.
"Being a farmer is very difficult," said Chris Massa, who farms 4 acres of hemp in Oxnard.

He pointed to health-related uses of the CBD oil made from hemp, but acknowledged the residents' concerns.
"I apologize, and I hope we can work together," he said. 
Although industrial hemp belongs to the same plant species as marijuana, it must by definition have negligible intoxicant properties.
The plants look the same, but industrial hemp cannot have any appreciable level of THC, the primary intoxicant in marijuana and hashish. The THC level must be tested at less than three-tenths of a percent for the crop to be harvested. Otherwise, it must be destroyed, Williams said.
Of 96 hemp sites in the county that have been sampled and tested so far, all but two passed, he said.
Numerous thefts have been reported from hemp fields, causing problems for growers trying to secure the crops and police investigating the crimes. 
Williams said at least a third of the people stealing hemp don't know the difference between the crop and marijuana. 
Individuals with serious criminal records from outside the county are implicated in the thefts, said Moorpark Police Chief Victor Fazio. He said that answering hemp-related calls is taking away from time officers can spend patrolling the streets.
City officials from Ojai and Camarillo urged the board to stop issuing permits for cultivation pending additional study.
Moorpark Mayor Janice Parvin said she had heard from more than 50 residents, many reporting health problems such as sore throats, headaches and asthma. 
But she hoped common ground could be found as the board weighs the interests of residents and growers. 
"There has to be a balance," she said.
 

Wednesday's marijuana legalization vote was truly historic — here's why

By Justin Strekal
Source: thehill.com

Image result for house bill 3884

On Wednesday, members of Congress did something that they had never done before. For the first time ever, a body of the U.S. Congress voted to end cannabis’ nearly century-long status as a federally prohibited substance.
By a vote of more than two to one, members of the United States House Judiciary Committee passed legislation, House Bill 3884: The Marijuana Opportunity, Reinvestment, and Expungement (MORE) Act. 
The MORE Act removes the marijuana plant from the federal Controlled Substances Act, thereby enabling states to enact their own cannabis regulations free from undue federal interference. The vote marks the first time that members of Congress have ever voted to federally deschedule cannabis. 
According to a 2018 Quinnipiac University poll, 70 percent of U.S. voters support this policy change. To date, 33 states have enacted laws regulating patients’ access to medical cannabis and nearly one in four Americans reside in a state where the adult use of marijuana is permitted. 
It is inappropriate for the federal government to continue to either interfere with or stand in the way of these voter-initiated policies. 
Members decision to move forward with the MORE Act is significant. This act is the most comprehensive marijuana reform bill ever introduced in Congress, and it’s backed by a broad coalition of civil rights, criminal justice, drug policy, and immigration groups.
This legislation seeks to address the millions of Americans who suffer from the stigma and lost opportunities associated with a low-level marijuana possession conviction. It provides funding and inducements to states to enact policies that expunge these criminal convictions from citizens’ records so that they can more successfully move on with their lives. 
And it also seeks to assist America’s military veterans by, for the first time, permitting physicians associated with the Veterans Administration the authority to recommend medical cannabis therapy to patients who reside in legal marijuana states.
It also permits those players in the existing state-legal marijuana industry to access to banking and other necessary financial services. 
Currently, federal law mandates that this multi-billion dollar industry operate on a cash-only basis — an environment that makes businesses more susceptible to theft and more difficult to audit. Growing a successful business is hard enough. Doing so without access to banking and credit is even tougher. The MORE Act ensures that these state-compliant businesses, and those millions of Americans who patronize them, are no longer subject to policies that needlessly place them in harm’s way.
Commenting on the bill just prior to the vote, Chairman Nadler (D-N.Y.) acknowledged that more than two in three Americans believe that the adult use of cannabis ought to be legal, according to the most recent national polling. He added: “States have led the way and continue to lead the way, but our federal laws have not kept pace with the obvious need for change. We need to catch up because of public support [in favor of legalizing marijuana] and because it is the right thing to do.”
It is for these reasons that members of the full House should now take up this issue on the House floor. Not only does this bill reverse the failed prohibition of cannabis, but it also provides pathways for opportunity and ownership in the emerging industry for those who have suffered the most under federal criminalization. 
It is time for Congress to right the past wrongs of the federal war on marijuana and for every member to show their constituents which side of history they stand on.
Justin Strekal is the political director for NORML, where he serves as an advocate to end the federal prohibition of marijuana and to reform our nation's laws to no longer discriminate against its consumers. 

Monday, November 18, 2019

Hemp and Energy

By Karhlyle Fletcher  
Source: cannabistech.com

Image result for hemp and energy

The reliance on fossil fuels forces dependence on countries such as Canada or Saudi Arabia and encourages the world to risk ruining entire environments in pursuit of energy. Modern society is accustomed to constant, always-available energy. Since there is no going back from modernity, one must mitigate the damages instead of trying to remove them entirely.

Hemp Solutions to Energy Demands Already Exist

Hemp batteries and hemp as a fuel source may sound far fetched to an average consumer, but those who are aware of hemp know the potential. These technologies don’t need to be invented, but like hemp plastics, already exist and are waiting to be adopted by the market.

Robert Murray-Smith and Steve have a video from 2016,  which shows how they built their hemp battery, and how it compares in performance to lithium batteries.

According to the tests they ran in 2016, Murray-Smith was able to find that hemp performed even better than Lithium batteries under stress. In 2019 they have already improved their process in hemp processing and preparation to make even superior batteries. They have improved output by 20% and found how to limit corrosion to the metal of the cell.

Another improvement, suggested by Karabetter, was to add some water to hemp ink to one layer of ink and then to layer ink unmixed with water over it. Hemp carbon is then sieved over the ink to add an even coating. All of them are then mixed to make a relatively thick, adherent layer of carbon coating, improving the performance of hemp as a fuel source even further.

Why Does Hemp Work as a Battery or as a Fuel Source?

Not only is hemp able to conduct electricity, it can be made into materials as hard as steel, hemp is also a valid source of biodiesel fuel. While hemp powered batteries show great promise for the industry of the electric automobile, anything that runs off regular diesel can use biodiesel. While biofuel still deals with emissions and thus a carbon footprint, the process of producing such fuel is much cleaner.

In addition to this, hemp can be used to make ethanol, which is typically produced through using wheat-based crops, including corn. While these substances work to make ethanol, using hemp as the basis for the production of ethanol allows for food stores to be used for supplying food rather than being cut into to produce fuel.

Hemp’s ability to perform phytoremediation also poses a great benefit, where other crops need ideal soil to grow in, hemp can perform well in poor soil, and leave it in a better state after every harvest. Instead of taking from the food industry, relying on hemp to produce ethanol will improve soil quality and availability for other crops.

This fuel is also versatile and can be used to power a wide range of machines, including conventional consumer vehicles. Although ethanol is an imperfect solution to fossil fuels, at least it leans away from the addiction the world has on fracking.

Exxon’s oil spills aren’t news to anyone who has paid attention in the last decade, as they have caused massive pollution, which has killed millions of birds and other wildlife in a single incident.
Hemp production has no such effects, although pesticides and other materials used during grows may pose a threat to the surrounding ecosystem. However, if cultivators are responsible, then there is no higher risk than growing any other crop in the agricultural industry.

Reliance on Hemp is not an Innovation, but a Return to Form

Although hemp led to an economic boom, humans have relied on hemp for thousands of years. It’s not that the modern industries should replace plastic, fuel, cotton, and other materials with hemp, but that they should revert their decision to replace hemp with these unsustainable and non-biodegradable substances.

Although biodiesel and ethanol produced from hemp is still being developed, and will likely need to wait for the hemp industry to mature for it to become economically viable, auto manufacturers like Porsche, Ford, and Honda are already incorporating hemp into their production. Hemp only takes months to produce while metals form over thousands of years, making hemp a cheaper substance to source, and because of the lightweight nature of hemp. It is also flexible and ideal for serval parts of manufacturing.

Considering that these titans in the car industries are already using hemp to build their cars, it will not be long until they start looking into incorporating hemp batteries into electric automobiles and offering hemp-based biofuel as an alternative to gasoline. It’s profitable, sustainable, and popular, so it’s only a matter of time.

The application of this technology is nearly endless, as it could be applied to simple household electronics or general heating. If the automobile industry adopts hemp as an energy source, though, it will significantly hasten the adoption of such energy sources. As soon as it’s proven to be a valid market alternative, the hemp energy market share will likely explode.

How UK Engineering is Using Hemp to Repair Deteriorating Kentucky Bridges

By Lindsey Piercy
Source: uknow.uky.edu

 
CatStrong
Since 1994, Issam Harik has been at the helm of a group of students researching the deployment of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites in bridges and buildings. Photo by: Eric Sanders


LEXINGTON, Ky. (Nov. 18, 2019) — Bridges are a crucial component of Kentucky's infrastructure — providing access between regions and cities and linking workers to jobs. But as traffic continues to increase, bridges across the state are aging at an accelerated pace.

According to the American Road & Transportation Builders Association, 7% of Kentucky's bridges are classified as "structurally deficient." What exactly does that mean? Well, more than 1,100 of them are in poor condition.

“Every bridge in the nation is inspected for deficiencies, at a minimum, once every two years. Bridges with known issues are inspected more frequently to ensure public safety," Issam Harik explained. "Each bridge has to be assessed individually in order to understand whether repair is needed.”

When a repair is needed — that's where Harik comes in. As a professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Kentucky, he offers much more than advice.

Since 1994, Harik has been at the helm of a group of students researching the deployment of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites in bridges and buildings. Through funding from the Department of Defense, Federal Highway Administration, the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, The National Academies and the Kentucky Science and Engineering Foundation, he and a team of talented students developed innovative products — dubbed CatStrong — for restoring bridges.
When asked why the name “CatStrong"? “Well, I am proud of our Wildcat legacy, and the products are very, very, strong,” Harik said.

Currently, CatStrong rod panels and fabrics come in different strengths. The strongest version can resist 195,000 pounds per foot of width — yet can be easily applied by one worker.

“The CatStrong family of products were developed to meet the repair needs of bridges when no other products were available on the market that satisfy the retrofit requirements," Harik explained. "All CatStrong products are tested experimentally and/or via computer models in order to assess their strengths and limitations."

Using remarkably resilient carbon fiber fabrics, panels and wraps, CatStrong has successfully restored more than 35 bridges by strengthening beams, columns, piles and walls. The lightweight product has yielded impressive results due to its ease of application.

“Whether in a bucket or platform truck or on special scaffolding over rivers, valleys, roadways, etc., this helps significantly with reducing the number of man hours and traffic control — which is usually the biggest expense on a job," Abheetha Peiris explained.

Peiris, a researcher at the Kentucky Transportation Center and one of Harik's former doctoral students, supervises the repair projects.

Despite unprecedented success, CatStrong has been on a quest to find an even more reliable resource. When introducing a new addition to their family of products, Harik leaned on a growing industry in the Commonwealth — the hemp industry.

As part of an experimental study, the team recently repaired one of the piles on the KY 32 bridge over Blaine Creek in Lawrence County using hemp — marking the first time the natural fiber has been used as a construction material for bridge repair.

Hemp, which is biodegradable and has a small carbon footprint, offers many advantages. "The limitations are low strength, incompatibility with existing resins, manufacturing processes and it is seasonable," Harik continued. "Some of the limitations can be overcome with ongoing and future research."

If the timeline for a project is five days, Harik says the majority of the time will be spent preparing. “Once the structural member section is built back to its original shape, we mix a two-part resin or paste and spread it on the surface. Then we press CatStrong into it, add another layer of paste over it and that’s it. Once applied, it will gain 80% of its strength within 24 hours.”

Harik, who wants to give credit where credit is due, admits he doesn't physically create the CatStrong wraps. Instead, that's the work of dedicated students — who he lovingly refers to as "Mignons." On any given day, you will find them working busily in the Structures Lab on campus.

From design to development, students are involved in every aspect of CatStrong. Their passion for the product — and its ability to make Kentucky bridges safer — is undeniable.  “It is very gratifying and exciting to analyze a product, fabricate it, test it and see it deployed in the field to solve a real problem — in short, it is amazing,” Ethan Russell, a UK engineering student, said.

For future deployments, CatStrong will experiment with plant, instead of epoxy, based resins to produce entirely plant-based biodegradable, flexible, lightweight and re-useable wraps.
The primary objective in the KY 32 bridge — and any repair project — is to optimize the use of taxpayers' funds while enhancing the state's infrastructure.

"The lessons learned from each project are used in future projects to upgrade and extend the life of bridges and buildings," Harik said. "None of the success achieved in these repair projects would have been possible without collaboration between UK, sponsoring agencies and industry."

Cross-pollination between marijuana and hemp is a budding conflict at outdoor grows

By Bart Schaneman
Source: denverpost.com

Hemp Cross-Pollination Could Damage Cannabis Crops—Here’s How to Prevent It
Image from Leafly.com

DENVER — Outdoor marijuana growers are reporting an increase in cross-pollination from hemp farms, a development that could mean marijuana cultivators might lose upwards of tens of thousands of dollars if their plants become unmarketable as flower products.

As the marijuana and hemp industries increasingly share the same cultivation territory, the number of conflicts is likely to increase, particularly in areas with thriving outdoor cannabis cultivation.
Washington state is a case in point. In April, Gov. Jay Inslee signed Senate Bill 5276 into law, opening the state up to hemp production in response to the 2018 Farm Bill in part by removing the previous 4-mile buffer between outdoor marijuana grows and hemp farms.

At least one marijuana farmer has experienced firsthand the consequences of this change in the law.
“We took a big hit,” said Robert Morf, who owns and operates Cheshire Creek, an outdoor marijuana cultivation operation in Waterville, Washington.

He estimated he will lose about $40,000 this year after his midsized, 600-plant farm was cross-pollinated by pollen from the male plants he said came from a neighboring hemp grower.

All to extract

According to Morf, his flower is full of seeds, reducing the usable volume and overall quality and value of the crop.

He won’t be able to sell it on the wholesale or retail flower market and will take a financial hit by selling it all for extraction.

Morf has grown marijuana for three years “out in the middle of nowhere” with no other cannabis cultivators for 30 miles.
He didn’t have any trouble with his neighbors until the buffer was removed under the new hemp law.
The hemp grower who leased the land from the farmers across the road assured Morf the plants would be grown from clones.
Since Morf was there first with his marijuana operation, it was up to him to give the OK, and he took it on faith the hemp growers would remove the male plants.
He thought “cross-pollination would have been worse for them than it would have been for me.”
Morf contacted his local and state political representatives as well as his contact at the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board (LCB), but he found no recourse.
To prove it wasn’t his own plants that pollinated his field, Morf pointed out that the LCB’s tracking system will show that he planted from female clones.
“We’ve gone through three years of growing, and the most I’ve seen is a female plant with one bud herming off a stem last year,” he added.
“Herming” refers to a cannabis plant developing both male and female flowers.
Morf has considered suing, but he figures it’s not worth the cost.
“At this point, it’s ‘screw it’ and move on,” he added.
The hemp growers have left the plants cut down in the field and won’t be returning next year to farm that land, Morf told Marijuana Business Daily.

Carefully source your seed

A similar problem is shaping up in the bordering state to the south, Oregon.
Pete Gendron, a grower in Sunny Valley and president of the Oregon SunGrowers Guild, estimated the cross-pollination issue is impacting about 8% of the state’s marijuana production.
In terms of total acreage affected by cross-pollination, it’s an increase from last year, he added.
That’s largely because the number of hemp acres has increased by about 500%.
According to Hemp Industry Daily, Oregon had 11,754 acres in 2018 and increased to 51,313 acres in 2019.
His advice to growers looking to avoid male plants showing up in their fields: Buy your seed from a reputable provider and try to make sure your hemp-growing neighbors are using feminized seeds.
Tell them, “if you pollinate me, you’re going to be pollinating yourself, too,” Gendron said.
“That being said, it won’t save you from field walking,” he added, meaning growers still need to check to ensure their plants haven’t hermed or that no male plants have grown from seed.
“It really only takes one (male plant) to ruin your day,” he said.

Colorado concerns

In Pueblo, Colorado, the area of the state with the largest amount of outdoor-grown marijuana, the county regulators have been working to allow both hemp and cannabis cultivators to coexist.
Steven Turetsky, managing director of Pueblo-based hemp grower Shi Farms, said hemp farmers have been asked to put their “best effort forward to not grow male plants.”
That’s in part because outdoor-grown marijuana has been a shot in the arm to the local economy.
The general sentiment is that hemp growers should all use clones to ensure the plants are females.
“Obviously, with cannabis, even if you plant from clones, there can be mutation,” Turetsky said. “But it significantly decreases the risk.”
He said he came to the realization that it’s beneficial for his company to act in good faith toward marijuana growers.
By also only using clones, his company has avoided dealing with vendors who might be selling nonfeminized seeds.
“We don’t want seeds, either,” he said.
According to Wendy Mosher, president and chief executive officer of Fort Collins, Colorado-based seed company New West Genetics, a grower will lose about 1% of total cannabinoid content if a field is cross-pollinated.
While Colorado is considered generally favorable to hemp compared to other states with marijuana programs, cross-pollination also is happening to hemp-based CBD farms in Colorado, she added.
When a hemp farm is cross-pollinated, the farmer can thresh the crop to try to salvage some of it.
Mosher said one male in a field a mile away can pollinate a crop, and it can be very difficult to determine the source.
“It’s just impossible to tell where it’s coming from,” she added.

USDA trying to help

The U.S. Department of Agriculture acknowledges the cross-pollination issue and has set aside money to address it.
In October, the agency awarded $500,000 to a Virginia Tech research team to get better data on pollen drift.
The goal is to predict how and where pollen grains travel.
Researchers will use drones to track pollen, hoping results can inform regulations on how far growers should keep hemp and marijuana apart to prevent damaging cross-pollination.
“Having a validated and reliable long-distance transport prediction model for wind-dispersed pollen is critical to establishing appropriate isolation distances,” plant sciences professor David Schmale said in a Virginia Tech statement announcing the grant.

Saturday, November 16, 2019

Vote To Federally Legalize Marijuana Planned In Congress

By Tom Angell
Source: forbes.com

A key congressional committee plans to hold a historic vote on a bill to end the federal prohibition of marijuana next week, two sources with knowledge of the soon-to-be-announced action said.

US-POLITICS-CANNAIBIS
AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES

The legislation, sponsored by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), would remove cannabis from the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and set aside funding to begin repairing the damage of the war on drugs, which has been disproportionately waged against communities of color.
Those programs—such as job training and legal aid for people impacted by prohibition enforcement, loans for small cannabis businesses owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals and efforts to minimize barriers to licensing and employment in the legal industry—would be paid for with a new federal five percent tax on marijuana sales instituted under the bill, and some of them would be administered by a new Cannabis Justice Office in the Department of Justice
The proposal, the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement (MORE) Act, would also provide for resentencing and expungement of records for people previously convicted of cannabis offenses and would shield immigrants from being denied citizenship status over marijuana.
It currently has 55 cosponsors, all but one of whom are Democrats.
A Senate companion is being led by Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), a 2020 presidential candidate, though it has not yet been scheduled for action in the GOP-controlled chamber.
Wednesday’s planned Judiciary Committee vote on the far-reaching cannabis reform legislation—which hasn’t yet been officially listed but is expected to be announced on Monday—comes about two months after the full House overwhelmingly approved a bipartisan bill to increase marijuana businesses’ access to banks.
Politico reported on Saturday that Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), who is not a member of the panel, vaguely mentioned upcoming committee consideration while speaking at a conference in Southern California.
The congresswoman reportedly didn’t clarify that the legislation would be formally “marked up,” or voted on, a detail that sources shared with Marijuana Moment in recent days. A Judiciary Committee spokesperson hasn’t responded to several inquiries about the pending vote.
The planned action on the bill, which would also block federal agencies from denying public benefits or security clearances over marijuana use, follows a hearing a Judiciary subcommittee held in July that examined the connection between marijuana legalization and racial justice.
The markup will provide the opportunity for lawmakers on both sides of the aisle to file amendments to the bill, and could shed further light on an emerging divide between cannabis reform supporters who feel it is essential to address past drug war harms and equity in the cannabis industry immediately and those who believe it makes more sense to advance more limited, states’ rights-focused legislation that could stand a better chance of advancing through the Senate and to President Trump’s desk.
Those tensions surfaced both during the Judiciary hearing this summer as well as in the lead up to the House floor vote on the cannabis banking legislation. Some pro-legalization groups went so far as to ask leadership to delay the scheduled vote on the financial services bill because they took issue with what is seen as an industry-focused proposal moving ahead of one containing restorative justice provisions such as the MORE Act.
In response to those concerns, top Democrats such as Nadler and House Minority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) pledged that while they were moving ahead with the banking vote, they also saw the importance of following up by advancing more comprehensive cannabis legislation.
Advancing the MORE Act or a similar descheduling proposal through committee and onto the House floor would make good on that pledge.
It’s less certain how the Senate would react to House passage of a far-reaching bill to end federal marijuana prohibition. Some advocates believe that only a more modest proposal to exempt state-approved cannabis activity from federal prohibition stands a chance in the Republican-controlled body.
That bill, the Strengthening the Tenth Amendment Through Entrusting States (STATES) Act, would not formally deschedule marijuana under the CSA and doesn’t include measures aimed at ensuring equity in the legal industry for communities most harmed by the drug war.
President Trump has voiced support for the less far-reaching bill, which is led by Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Cory Gardner (R-CO).