Monday, April 28, 2014

Earth Day: You are what you wear?

By Ray Sola
Source: dcourier.com

Courtesy photos

Organic clothing not only feels better, it is better for the whole planet.

Organic cotton is not genetically modified and  grown without using pesticides.  Organic Cotton keeps your skin free from toxic chemicals that are embedded into the cotton plant even after it has been processed.

Residual chemicals may also irritate skin.  People with allergies and chemical sensitivity especially benefit from organic clothing, as conventional cotton may retain harmful toxic residues. Even if you don't have sensitive skin, organic cotton just feels better. The fibers of organic cotton are longer, softer and less brittle, making them more comfortable to wear.

Organic cotton not only doesn't use pesticides, but it uses a lot less water. How? Because organic cotton is a rotation crop. When crops are rotated, the soil maintains its nutrients and is better able to hold water.

Organic Bamboo is another great choice.  The benefits of bamboo are abundant. Because bamboo grows so quickly, it is a resource that is not only sustainable, but also gives back to the environment.  Bamboo grows rapidly, requiring no fertilizers, pesticides or herbicides in its growing process, and remains one of the most efficient sustainable fabrics by totally replenishing itself every six years.

Hemp has been used for centuries to make everything from rope to clothing, to paper. Hemp is illegal to grow in the US, even though the hemp plant is different from the marijuana plant and doesn't get anyone high.  Smoking hemp would get you nothing more than a few trips to the bathroom as a laxative.  We can import hemp products into the US, so your shirts are perfectly legal to wear and be proud of.

Beyond the environment, there are many benefits for the people wearing bamboo or hemp. Bamboo fabric is lightweight and strong, while being smooth and softer than cotton.  It feels like cashmere but is machine washable. Hemp has been compared to linen and has four times the strength of cotton.

It won't weaken when washed yet becomes softer with use.

The fabrics have insulating properties keeping the wearer cool in the summer and warm in the winter.  Both keep your body dry and have anti-bacterial qualities.  They filter UV light, protecting your skin and resist bacterial growth, so you won't smell.  They have a porous personality that allows it to breathe, keeping you cool in the summer and warmer in cooler weather.

You can wear your organic clothing out on the town and you may walk a little taller.





The face of hemp in Washington

Industrial hemp has a lobbyist, and he's a true believer


Source: yahoo.com

(Chris Moody/Yahoo News)

Ben Droz loosened the red paisley tie around his neck, pulled the knot over his head and replaced it with a skinny black cord made of hemp with sterling silver tassels at the ends. He reached into his pocket and pulled out a couple of plastic tie slides—a screaming eagle and a geometric wood piece—that would, when attached, turn the string into a bolo tie.
“This one’s more subtle, more professional,” Droz said, selecting the wooden piece. He pulled it up the string toward his Adam's apple. His bolo tie in place, he was ready to “go lobbying,” as Droz put it.
Droz is the American hemp industry’s main man in Washington. As a registered lobbyist for Vote Hemp, an advocacy group that works to loosen hemp laws, Droz, a 27-year-old from Pennsylvania with a thick head of hair and caterpillar eyebrows that make him appear eternally excited, has made it his life mission to bring the gospel of hemp to the leaders of America’s capital city. For the past five years, Droz has loaded up a hemp briefcase with hemp products — granola bars, seeds and paper, to name just a few — and walked the halls of the Capitol Building preaching the glories of hemp.
You’ve heard of industries having an army of lobbyists. Hemp has as army of one, in the person of Droz.
“It’s an army of passion,” Droz said.
He has his work cut out for him. In the United States, there are tough federal restrictions on importing and growing live hemp seeds. As a variant of the cannabis plant, which comes from the same botanical family as marijuana, hemp can be grown in a limited number of states only for industrial purposes and only with special permission from the Drug Enforcement Administration. Because of these restrictions, most hemp products sold in the U.S. are made overseas and shipped here.
On any given day, Droz is a walking billboard for those products. He sports a tan button-down hemp dress shirt over a white undershirt, also made of hempHemp-knit socks cover his feet. A hemp bolo tie adorns his neck; a hemp bracelet circles his wrist. In his pocket, he carries a hemp wallet, which houses his hemp-paper business cards. In the mornings, he washes his body with hemp soap and styles his hair with hemp hair cream. He even wears hemp-cloth underwear, he says. And he’s saving up money to one day buy a hemp business suit, on which he will place the American flag lapel pin he wears that reads, “Hemp Is Patriotic.”
When I met up with Droz on an April morning to see him in action, his schedule was packed with meetings, photo shoots and presentations about hemp. (When he’s not pushing hemp at the Capitol, Droz moonlights as a professional photographer.) His day would begin with a presentation to conservative activists, followed by a photo gig downtown. Then it was off to Capitol Hill to meet with staff for Colorado Democratic Rep. Jared Polis and Kentucky Republican Rep. Thomas Massie, two of hemp’s biggest supporters in Congress. Thence to the Phoenix Park Hotel near Union Station to scope out a venue for an upcoming cocktail reception for hemp supporters. After a meeting with staff of Oregon Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden, he ran across town to take headshots for a PR firm, followed by another shoot at a stand-up comedy competition near U Street that would last late into the night.
“It’s nonstop for me, because there’s no real distinction between what counts as working and what’s not,” Droz said, describing his life. It’s a plight he shares with thousands of other single, overworked 20- and 30-somethings in the District of Columbia. “I feel like I have three jobs. I do all of this hemp stuff, then I do photography, then I also do a lot of Facebooking, because networking is a big part of photography. I’m just constantly working around the clock.”
Grover Norquist hosted Droz for his first stop of the day, the legendary Wednesday meeting of conservative activists organized by the anti-tax lobbyist for two decades. Droz, who voted for President Barack Obama in 2008 and considers climate change one of the world’s greatest dangers, doesn’t necessarily consider himself a conservative. But cannabis advocates have made inroads with conservatives in recent years by pitching decriminalization as a states' rights issue and a move toward a world with fewer government regulations.
For his presentation, Droz chose to wear the red traditional necktie instead of his beloved bolo, which he left in a pocket.
“With the conservatives,” he explained, “I never want to come across as too fringe.”
When Norquist introduced Droz as a hemp advocate, some in the audience chuckled. Droz ignored it and launched into a brief speech about “harmful federal regulations” intended to appeal to the Reaganite hearts of the assembled.
“We are working to remove harmful federal regulations on industrial hemp production in the U.S.,” Droz said, once the giggling died down. “We can’t grow hemp in the U.S., and that’s exactly what we’re working on.”
Droz rattled off statistics about hemp in the lobbying equivalent of an elevator pitch. It’s a half-billion-dollar industry, he said, but most of the products have to be imported from abroad, and three new states removed their barriers to hemp production in 2014, bringing the number up to 13. “This is not really a controversial issue anymore,” he told the conservatives. Under current law, he said, the states need federal approval to grow hemp, and he needs help passing a bill to give states control over their own hemp laws without federal interference.
On the actual elevator after the meeting, Michael Moroney, who works at the Franklin Center, a conservative journalism nonprofit, shot a knowing smirk at Droz. “Handing out pot candy there, Ben?”
“It’s hemp,” Droz replied. “Not marijuana.”
Moroney smiled. “I know, man,” he said. They both laughed at his ribbing, and Droz promised to get Moroney some hemp granola bars, Droz’s most popular product.
“Everybody makes jokes like that, but the truth is, they know the difference. He knows he’s making a joke,” Droz told me. “They always giggle. But here’s the thing that’s great: They used to giggle and not know what hemp is. But now they giggle and they do know what it is. That’s a big difference.”
Indeed, in just the past few years, hemp in America has grown from an obscure plant used mostly to produce household decorations for stoners and latter-day hippies and into a source of goods that busy mothers can buy at Costco.
In June 2013, 63 Republicans joined 162 Democrats to pass an amendment to the Farm Bill that authorized hemp research in states where hemp farming is legal. Encouraged by that victory, Droz is working to raise support for the Industrial Hemp Farming Act, which would amend the Controlled Substance Act by decoupling hemp from marijuana — thereby freeing up states to legalize hemp as they wish. On the right, the bill has support from Kentucky Republican Sens. Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul and Rep. Massie.
“When I first started this, it was only lefties who are into this,” Droz said. “But it’s really changed a lot, because of the states' rights approach.”
With his presentation at the Norquist meeting over, Droz, juggling his hemp gear and camera equipment, rushed down the street for a photo shoot with a young real estate mogul at D.C.’s City Center, a new complex of apartments, shops and restaurants.
“It’s a crazy day,” Droz muttered. On the way, he berated himself for the two-minute presentation he’d made that morning. “I forgot to mention the Industrial Hemp Farming Act,” he said. “I’m not killing it as hard as I sometimes am. I’m sorry about that.”
Droz wrapped his photo shoot and then dropped off some of his gear at a nearby office of the PR firm where he would shoot later that day. That was when he removed his traditional tie and got comfortable in his bolo, which he calls his “YOLO bolo.”
Droz fell in love with bolo ties a few years ago when he found that he could buy them made out of hemp and that nearly everyone he met would stop and ask him about his neckwear when he wore bolo ties. He even started designing his own hemp ties, which he sells on Etsy and promotes on his new website, YoloBolo.com.
“I started wearing bolos as a way to get the conversation going about hemp,” he said. “People just love talking about it. The fact that I can talk about it means I can always talk about hemp, which is my goal. People remember me. I’m the guy with the bolo tie. I’m that hemp guy.”
With his new neckwear in place, Droz caught the Metro to Capitol Hill. His next challenge: Educating Capitol Police at a security station of the Longworth House Office Building that hemp seeds can enter the building. Droz dumped a handful of yellow bags full of edible hemp seeds onto the conveyer belt for screening briefcases. An officer snatched one up and inspected it.
“It’s hemp seed,” Droz informed her. “Totally legal.” In order to enter the United States, edible hemp seeds must first be sterilized, and these were.
(The officer holding Droz’s seeds was the same officer who just last year arrested a marijuana activist who was passing out samples of pot candy in a congressional office building.)
Waved in by the officer, Droz stopped for lunch at the bustling Longworth cafeteria, where he spotted Howard Wooldridge, a well-known former police officer and pro-pot activist from Texas who wears an oversized cowboy hat and a shirt that reads, “COPS SAY LEGALIZE POT ASK ME WHY.” Droz bought a salad and sat down.
“Officially there’s a big wall between his issue and mine,” Wooldridge said. “That’s by design from his side, because you don’t want to taint the hemp issue with the marijuana issue. His job is straightforward capitalism, straightforward agricultural issues. Period. It ain’t got nothing to do with drugs.”
While I talked to Wooldridge, Droz ripped open one of the yellow bags of hemp seed.
“It’s time to hempify my lunch,” he declared, dumping the entirety of the bag over the greens and shaking the salad to mix in the seeds.
Over lunch, Droz went over some of the challenges he faces as one of the only national activists for a cause few Americans think much about and that many lawmakers still see as a drug policy issue.
“I haven’t been accepted by the mainstream agriculture lobbyists,” he said. “Hemp is such a small issue for agriculture. It’s not an issue they talk a lot about. It’s not an issue they’re passionate about. It’s hard to get them engaged as other people. The goal is for me to be mainstream.”
That will take some doing. About the time Droz finished lunch, a lobbyist from the United Nations Foundation spotted the open hemp seed bag and walked over to introduce himself. “Where can I purchase those? You didn’t get this at the House cafeteria, right?” he asked, before picking up the bag and pulling it toward his nose for a sniff.
“Smells like weed,” he said.
Droz looked up at him. “No it doesn’t, OK?” he said. “This is what people say every time. People smell my briefcase. People smell my shirt, thinking it’s going to smell like weed.”
I took the bag and smelled it. You could definitely discern an olfactory resemblance to hemp’s cousin.
“OK maybe a little bit,” Droz conceded. “If you’re untrained, you could say it smells like weed.”
Droz, of course, can smell the difference.
With his belly full of hemp seeds, Droz began his daily rounds to congressional offices. Over the course of a year, he will typically visit hundreds of lawmakers. Sometimes he holds long, prescheduled meetings with staffers sympathetic to his cause. Other times he just pops into offices to say "Hello" and drop off hemp granola bars.
“Sometimes I just do it randomly,” he said.
When he arrived at Massie’s office, the staffers there greeted Droz by his first name. He and an aide sat down in the lawmaker’s personal office and discussed how they could gain more support across the Capitol for the Senate version of Massie’s bill. So far, no one in the upper chamber is taking enough of a leadership role on the issue to do what it takes to get the bill passed, Droz explained.
The theme is a constant one for the one-man, single-issue lobby shop. With so many pressing issues facing lawmakers, how do you get powerful people to care about a single plant, especially when there’s the risk that constituents might confuse it with support for an illegal drug?
It wasn’t always like this. Before live hemp seeds became controversial — and eventually illegal — in the 20th century, they were widely used throughout the United States for all kinds of purposes.
In fact, hemp literally brought people to America.
“The first Americans who came here brought hemp with them. They not only brought hemp, they sailed here using hemp sails,” Droz said of early European settlers. “You used to be able to pay your taxes in barrels of hemp.”
In 1942, during World War II, the Department of Agriculture even made a pro-hemp propaganda film, “Hemp for Victory.”
All of that changed under the Controlled Substances Act in the 1970s, when hemp was lumped as an illegal drug with marijuana. Hemp fell out of fashion for decades and has only recently re-emerged on the U.S. market as an eco-friendly alternative to a variety of products.
“It’s been slow and steady progress over the years,” Vote Hemp President Eric Steenstra — Droz’s boss — said. In 2005, then-Texas Rep. Ron Paul introduced a bill to legalize live hemp seeds; he gained only a couple of co-sponsors. It wasn’t until the farm bill last year that the industry saw its first real win. “Over time we just realized that we had to go door-to-door and educate on this, and that’s what we’ve been doing,” Steenstra said.
And that is exactly what Droz does on Capitol Hill, day after day. His meeting with Massie’s aide on Wednesday led to another meeting with a staff member from Polis’ office, where hemp enjoys support. Sitting on a couch next to Polis’ desk, Droz and an aide brainstormed ideas on how to encourage the DEA to start accepting live seeds inside the country. The DEA has said it’s in a policy review period, putting the hemp industry in a state of limbo. Lawmakers such as Polis could possibly help, Droz said, by sending a letter to the DEA urging it to make a decision.
“Why won’t they do anything about it?” Droz said. “It’s so not OK!”
Before the meeting ended, Droz told the staffer about Vote Hemp’s upcoming lobby day during Hemp History Week (the first week of June), when scores of hemp activists were planning a trip to Washington, D.C. Vote Hemp hopes to hold a reception for lawmakers and a briefing on the issue at that time.
The staffer looked at his calendar and informed Droz of one big problem: Congress won’t be in session that week. Droz took a deep breath.
After the meeting, Droz called Steenstra to report the news of their poor scheduling. If that wasn’t bad enough, Droz also learned it was against the rules to hand out promotional materials bearing a logo at a Senate conference room where they were planning a Hemp History Week event — and they had already printed fliers and literature. “That totally sucks! I don’t know what we’re going to do anymore. Damn it,” Droz said after the phone call. “Hemp History Week is totally falling apart!”
“I can only do so much,” he said.
Despite the moment of panic, Droz never lost his composure. He turned to me. “I’m glad you’re here,” he said. “You get to see what it’s like.”
Before he left the Capitol, Droz ducked into California Democrat Zoe Lofgren’s office unannounced to thank her staff for her supporting industrial hemp farming.
Droz reached into his pocket and pulled out a yellow package of hemp seeds. With a wide smile, he tossed it over the desk of a staff assistant in the front room. “That’s for the congresswoman.”


Federal government should recognize hemp, reschedule cannabis and encourage research

By Punditty
Source: allvoices.com

Learn more about cannabis
Hemp seeds, pictured here, are nutritional and have no psychoactive properties, yet poorly designed drug laws restrict their growth in the United States. (Image: D-Kuru via Wikimedia Commons)

Author’s note: This is Part 3 of a three-part series. Part 1 can beaccessed here, and Part 2 can be found here.
Opinion
Since 1996, when Californians voted 56 to 44 percent in favor of legalizing medical marijuana, the federal government has been fighting a losing battle in its ongoing attempts to demonize a plant that George WashingtonThomas Jefferson and other founding fathers considered one of the most useful crops known to humanity.
“Make the most of the Indian hemp seed, and sow it everywhere!” Washington wrote to his gardener in 1794. The presidential gardener obliged.
Washington and Jefferson were not colonial versions of Cheech and Chong. They were, however, capable farmers who recognized the value of hemp, another name for cannabis and marijuana. Just as cannabis sativa can be grown and harvested for the intoxicating buds on female plants, the plant can be grown for fuel, fiber and food. Hemp seeds, which are not intoxicating, contain crucial omega-3 fatty acid and high levels of vitamins A, C and E, among other nutrients.
From the outset, any honest assessment of the plant that produces what is commonly referred to as “marijuana” must include the versatility and usefulness of the hemp plant, which is finally getting a fair shot at becoming a cash crop once again. The farm bill President Barack Obama signed in February included a clause authorizing colleges and universities in the 11 states where industrial hemp is legal to grow it for research purposes.
That’s a good start, but the government should go further and make a distinction between farming cannabis sativa for fiber, fuel and food and growing it for buds to be used medicinally or recreationally. Until that happens, all discussion of whether marijuana should be legalized for medical or recreational purposes will be tilted in favor of the legalization crowd, simply because there is no good reason cannabis sativa should not be grown for hemp. The current law is akin to outlawing corn because some enterprising farmer might decide to make white lightning with a portion of his harvest.
While the government is adjusting its official relationship with hemp, it should pay a visit to the drug schedules established under the Controlled Substances Act. Sooner rather than later, it needs to move “marihuana” from the roster of Schedule I hallucinogenic drugs, where it is listed between LSD and mescaline among drugs that have no known medical value and a high abuse potential, to a Schedule III drug, one with currently accepted medical uses and less potential for abuse than Schedule I and II drugs.
That move would solve a plethora of problems in the 20-plus states where medical marijuana is legal, and it would actually allow physicians to prescribe rather than “recommend” marijuana as medicine. And while the feds are at it, it would show an enormous amount of good faith to replace the current term “marihuana” with “cannabis,” the botanical name for the plant.
In February, 18 congressional representatives called on Obama to reclassify marijuana as a Schedule II drug, which would be an improvement from its current status but not in the category where it ultimately belongs. Earlier this month, Attorney General Eric Holder told a House Appropriations subcommittee he was willing to work with Congress to reclassify marijuana under the CSA. But as Reason points out, the executive branch has the authority to move marijuana to a different category but probably not the authority to remove it altogether.
It seems as though Holder is trying to get more support from Congress before making the move. This is something that should have bipartisan support with national polls consistently showing around 70 percent support for medical marijuana. Cannabis, of course, was an accepted medicine in the American pharmacopeia from the 1850s until the 1930s. It was then that Federal Narcotics Commissioner Harry Anslinger came onto the scene. His abuse of power, well-documented racism and willful ignorance toward marijuana is recounted in the 2012 book “Smoke Signals” by Martin A. Lee. Anslinger, according to a recent ad by Common Sense Drug Policy, “is almost single-handedly responsible for outlawing marijuana.”
It’s time that all sides in the marijuana debate learn about the role Anslinger played in developing polices that led to marijuana being outlawed in 1937.
Finally, especially in light of the much-hyped, recent marijuana-brain study by Northwestern and Harvard researchers, it is time for the United States to take an even-handed and fair-minded approach to research on cannabis, pro and con. When NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell recently talked about the possibility of allowing players to use medical marijuana to treat head injuries, it was at least partly because research from Israel indicates it might be helpful.
Why are American scientists so often blocked in doing legitimate research on marijuana?
Thankfully, a study on treating veterans’ post-traumatic stress disorder with medical cannabis was approved in March for Arizona – but a misguided Republican state senator blocked the funding because she wanted to use money for the study to educate children about the dangers of recreational marijuana.
It should go without saying that no one wants to see kids get hooked on marijuana. But we should also be willing to study ways to bring relief to veterans suffering from PTSD. In Arizona, the politics of pandering won out over science.
Until we as a nation can tell the truth about marijuana, there’s little hope for rational policy. Truth-telling means including uses for hemp and the medical properties of cannabis -- not just hand-picked, government-sponsored research -- in the legalization debate. It also means conducting studies in the spirit of free and open inquiry to determine both the benefits and risks associated with cannabis use.
Then, and only then, will we be able to make truly informed decisions and legislate accordingly.
Additional sources and resources:
Punditty is based in Santa Cruz, California, United States of America, and is an Anchor for Allvoices.






Bringing It Home (Jack Herer Was Right): Hemp Earth Day 2014 ~ New Film Review

Source: digitaljournal.com

In an Earth Day review of the hemp documentary Bringing It Home (2013), author Bryan W. Brickner notes the wisdom and logic of Jack Herer, the Hemperor, who was well known for saying hemp could save the planet. 

Brickner has a 1997 political science doctorate from Purdue University, is the author of several political theory books, such as The Promise Keepers (1999) and The Book of the Is (2013), and publisher of The Cannabis Papers (2011).

In Bringing It Home (Jack Herer Was Right): Hemp Earth Day 2014, Brickner reviews Linda Booker and Blaire Johnson's documentary film, subtitled: industrial hemp, healthy houses and a greener future for America. The new review on the Bryan William Brickner Blog notes the psychological elements of the film (ill child in need of a safe environment / father completes the mission) by recalling what Herer taught: hemp can save the planet.

"Herer authored The Emperor Wears No Clothes (1985)," commented Brickner, "a book about the political and economic story behind America's war on marijuana. The book teaches – like the movie does – that hemp can save the planet and heal the earth."

"Bringing It Home makes not growing our own hemp," continued Brickner, "look like an economic and environmental failure and goes one step further; from a business and government angle, the film shows America needs hemp investment for infrastructure; mostly, networks of fiber processing plants near the hemp fields in order to turn the plant green into cash green."

"Jack Herer was right," Brickner finished, "and Bringing It Home echoes his spirit."






Monday, April 21, 2014

Industrial hemp registration ends May 1

Source: lajuntatribunedemocrat.com

Those interested in growing industrial hemp during Colorado’s 2014 season must register with the Colorado Department of Agriculture by May 1, 2014.

LAKEWOOD, Colo. – Those interested in growing industrial hemp during Colorado’s 2014 season must register with the Colorado Department of Agriculture by May 1, 2014.

“The rest of the country is watching how we work through this history-making season. It is vital that farmers register if they want to grow industrial hemp; therefore, if industrial hemp is grown without registering with the Colorado Department of Agriculture, law enforcement may be contacted," said Colorado Deputy Commissioner of Agriculture Ron Carleton.

Registration

To register, visit www.colorado.gov/ag/dpi and click on “Industrial Hemp.” Registrants will need to print the registration form, fill it out, and mail it to the department with the appropriate amount of payment. Those wishing to pay by credit card or cash must hand deliver payment to CDA at 700 Kipling St., Suite 4000, Lakewood, CO 80215.

The annual registration fee for commercial production of industrial hemp will be $200 plus $1/acre. The annual registration fee for production of industrial hemp for research and development will be $100 plus $5/acre.

Upon receipt of the application, the form will be reviewed for completeness. If approved, a certificate will be sent to the registrant. All registrants must receive the approved CDA certificate before they begin planting industrial hemp. Each certificate will be valid for one year from date of issuance.

All registrants are subject to sampling of their industrial hemp crop to verify that the THC concentration does not exceed 0.3 percent on dry weight basis; up to 33 percent of the registrants will be inspected each year. During the inspection, the registrant or authorized representative must provide the Department’s inspector with complete and unrestricted access to all industrial hemp plants and seeds whether growing or harvested, all land, buildings and other structures used for the cultivation and storage of industrial hemp, and all documents and records pertaining to the registrant’s industrial hemp growing business.

“Registration is one of the first steps to creating a successful, viable, legal product; it is instrumental that producers help us develop an industry to set the standard across the country,” continued Carleton.

Challenges

Potential registrants should be aware of uncertainties that still exist because of federal law. CDA’s regulatory role with industrial hemp is limited to registration of growers and inspection of crop. The State of Colorado has no jurisdiction over many other factors that producers are faced with. While Colorado legalized the production of hemp (Cannabis spp), growing it commercially is still considered illegal under federal law. The Department of Justice has issued guidelines that will, if followed, limit the likelihood of federal enforcement against commercial producers.

The following issues may cause concern for those interested in growing this crop in Colorado. It is important that potential registrants are aware of these issues and understand the potential risks.

Seed Procurement/Seed Quality — Seed that exists in Colorado may be variable and have unknown THC levels. Random sampling of hemp fields will be conducted. Plant samples testing at levels higher than 0.3 percent THC will be in violation of the Colorado Industrial Hemp Registration and Production Act. Importation of viable industrial hemp seed across state lines and country boundaries is illegal under the Federal Controlled Substances Act.

• Pesticides — There are not any pesticides (herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, etc.) currently registered for use on Cannabis spp. (industrial hemp and marijuana) due to the predominant federal nature of pesticide regulation. The CDA is developing rules to determine which pesticides could be used on Cannabis spp. and not constitute a violation of pesticide labeling or other federal and state pesticide laws and regulations. The list of allowable pesticides will be extremely limited.

• Federal farm programs — such as crop insurance, farm loans and conservation reserve may be jeopardized if industrial hemp is planted; these programs are managed by the US Department of Agriculture, a federal agency. Contact a lawyer for legal advice.

• Banking — even though the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury recently issued guidance on bank involvement with cannabis operations, banks, including state-chartered banks may be reluctant to provide services to cannabis growers for fear of being prosecuted for federal laws and regulations violations.

• Processing — Colorado’s industrial hemp rules state that industrial hemp producers must provide documentation of in-state processing as part of registration. It is unknown at this time how many processing facilities will be available in Colorado at time of harvest.

History and rule

Late last year, the Colorado Department of Agriculture adopted the first industrial hemp rules in the state’s history. The rules were developed in response to the passing of Amendment 64 and legislation enacted by the Colorado General Assembly in 2013. SB13-241 delegates to the department the responsibility for establishing a cultivation registration and inspection program.

The entire rule and additional information on industrial hemp can be found by visiting www.colorado.gov/ag/dpi and click on “industrial hemp.”



Tennessee lawmakers seek to nullify federal hemp ban

BY JUSTIN KING
Source: digitaljournal.com

Nashville - This week lawmakers in Tennessee completed the final step before a bill legalizing the production of hemp could be sent to the Governor. If signed, the bill could nullify federal laws banning its production, depending on how the state law is implemented.
The bill written by Representative Jeremy Faison overwhelmingly cleared Tennessee’s General Assembly. In the state Senate, not a single senator voted against the bill.
The legislation compels the state’s Department of Agriculture to issue permits allowing the production of hemp. Tennessee’s Department of Agriculture has 120 days from the date of signing to establish regulations for the issuing of licenses.

While full-scale production of the plant is still banned under federal law, a small section deep inside the almost 1000-page Farm Bill, signed into law by President Obama in February authorizes it to be grown under certain circumstances for research purposes. It is unclear if Tennessee intends to move ahead with full-scale production immediately.
Mike Maharrey of the Tenth Amendment Center believes the state will move ahead, and points to the wording of the legislation.
By including the word ‘shall’ in this legislation, it has a great deal of impact. This means that rather than keeping it open-ended like other states have done, hemp farming will be able to move forward in Tennessee whether the regulatory bureaucrats there want it to or not.
Though the plant is similar to marijuana, it contains very little of the psychoactive ingredient THC. The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation initially opposed the bill until an amendment was added providing for oversight of production. Agency spokesman Josh DeVine said
We opposed the bill when first introduced because, as written, it allowed for the production of industrial hemp without any oversight. The amendment, added during the legislative process, requires oversight and licensing from the state's Department of Agriculture. With that in mind, we don't have a particular position on the issue one way or the other.
The plant is fast-growing, and a crop can yield in just four months. The plant’s commercial uses seem endless. Bio-fuels, textiles, lipstick, paper, and even some plastic products can all be manufactured using this renewable resource that replenishes itself quickly.



Hemp processing plan turns straw into briquettes

by 


A proposal from a Regina entrepreneur adds to the growing list of plans to process hemp in Western Canada for industrial purposes. 

After two years of research and development, Thomas Chevalier said he hopes to set up a plant by the end of this year in Gilbert Plains, Man., producing biomass briquettes from hemp straw.

His business, IMBH, is currently a finalist in the Saskatchewan Business Challenge, a program for start-up businesses. 

“What I did is I drove around all of Canada. I went to industry events. I went to conferences, and that’s kind of how I got my feet wet,” he said. 

“I saw what was in the market and I saw what was missing.”

Chevalier also plans to produce a hemp product targeting bioplastics. 

Once operating, Chevalier said he intends to process 3,000 to 5,000 tonnes of hemp straw per year, 
which would come from 1,400 to 1,500 acres of the crop bought from nearby growers.

He said growers will receive $90 to $100 per tonne for the straw. 

“Right now they’re burning it. You can’t feed hemp straw to your cattle. They’re basically stuck with the straw,” he said. 

“You need to get it off the ground. What we’re doing is getting farmers to swath and bale it. You store it on your farm, we’ll pick it up on a monthly basis and we’ll pay you for that.” 

Farmers planted 67,000 acres of hemp in Canada last year. Most of it was grown for seed under contracts with two major hemp seed companies in Manitoba that make food products. Hemp exports from Canada are already worth tens of millions of dollars.

Several other industrial fibre projects have been announced in Western Canada. 

Plains Industrial Hemp Processing has set up shop in Manitoba, while Stemia and Cylab International have announced plans to operate facilities in Alberta. 

Chevalier said he is interested in eventually working with growers in Saskatchewan, but processing is more cost effective in areas where growers are consolidated. 

“There are more hemp growers in a closer proximity (in Manitoba),” he said. 

“The seed varieties are a little more adapted to their conditions and environment. When we took the straw samples, we found more consistency with theirs than out here (in Saskatchewan). I think it’s because out here there’s a lot of clay, unless you go up north. That’s where you’ll find the best hemp straw, in my opinion.”

Hemp produced for seed comes from shorter varieties, but cultivars exist to produce taller plants intended for fibre processing.

“We’re not asking growers to change what they’re doing now,” he said. “All we’re doing is buying the straw that’s left over from seed production.”

The federal health department regulates hemp production in Canada, which has drawn criticism from industry officials. Growers must be licensed by the federal regulator to buy certified seed. 

“As long as Health Canada regulates the hemp industry, I don’t think we’re going to see the big boom we’re hoping to see,” Chevalier said.